Ok, so the launch day of this two big winter titles is getting closer, will you buy one or another? Both? Or none of the two? Here some (hopefully) facts.
Battlefield 3
-Single player campaign based on Iran-Iraq Theme
-More multiplayer players, 64 while bc2 had only max 32 (but devs said that the game could have supported up to 128)
-No mod tool, as in BC2 (devs said frostbite 2 sdk is too hard to use)
-Online Stat via website (free)
-Requires Origin, a digital shop similar to Steam (EA don’t like the monopoly Steam is building)
-Gameplay wise the title looks very similar to BC2 with addiction of aircrafts and different gamemodes.
-Co-op modes.
-No private Servers, they must be rented only from authorized providers.
Modern WarFare 3
-Single player campaign more “fictional-movie” resume the story of MW2
-Multiplayer Up to 32 players?
-No mod tool.
-Online Stat via website (free and paid version with advanced features)
-Using Steam.
-Gameplay is identical to previous versions, with some little difference and game modes in multiplayer.
-Co-op modes.
-Private Server allowed.
The above refers to PC versions of the games, please comment to tell me if i wrote something wrong or if i need to add something.. oh and have a nice play.. pew pew pew.. 😆
Nice and all, but why don’t they just admit, that they won’t release mod tools, because they don’t want mods to be more popular, than DLCs? I want PR for BF3.
YE Selling DLC is the main real reason beacouse they don t release mod tools..
I remember back in the days of bf1942, i was addicted to Desert Combat, a super mod.
Controller Support:
Battlefield 3 = Yes
Call Of Duty: MW3 = No
(Though tbh i would like to see a feature for PS3 controller support, not all of us like Xbox configuration.)
Ye a controller for the campaign sounds reasonable but for online battles?
this post was made before the release of the games.